Search for: "In re Smith (1976)"
Results 81 - 100
of 200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 2:00 am
In re Estate of Thomas F. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:10 am
Ohio, 426 US 610 (1976). [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
" (In re Martin-Trigona) The case (as well as the many other cases filed in federal district court by Matthew Washington) undoubtedly produced some of the most hilarious motions and ridiculous circumstances in the modern history of the courts - I say ridiculous because this particular pro se litigant took especial care to file each and every motion properly with the court, making it part of the record AND requiring a judge or magistrate to deal with each motion in turn.In… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
Smith, 2007 Ida. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Hittle Service, Inc., 549 P.2d 1383, 1390 (Kans. 1976). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:33 am
A state district court judge recently re-sentenced Kennard to time served under the new sentencing guidelines. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
We're happy to share. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:52 pm
—Fort Worth 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.) [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Western Auto Supply Co., 18 P.3d 49, 56-58 (Alaska 2001) (§12); Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Today we're going to speculate a bit about what might happen if we win. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
Dist. of Cal., 426U.S. 394, 403 (1976) (alteration in original)). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (1976) (plurality opinion). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
Supp. 177, S.D.N.Y. 1976). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:14 pm
Circuit, and in the Florida District Court before which Trump is being prosecuted by Jack Smith. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Pataki, 408 F.3d at 87 [New York has an "interest in monitoring gun licensees"] and 408 F.3d at 91 ["(t)he State has a substantial and legitimate interest ... in insuring the safety of the general public from individuals who, by their conduct, have shown themselves to be lacking the essential temperament or character which should be present in one entrusted with a dangerous instrument" [quoting In re Pelose, 5,3 A.D.2d 645, 384 N.Y.S.2d 499 (2d Dept.1976) ] ). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976); Hampton v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Nearly five decades later, he finally has some measure of justice,” said Mary-Kathryn Smith, one of Mr. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
We’re talking about discrimination based on RACE. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
