Search for: "In the Interest of: F.S., Appeal of: F.S." Results 81 - 100 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 8:46 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
On appeal the Fourth District Court held that the probate court erred in part in ruling that the transfer of the husband’s interest in the property to the daughter after his death was not a devise subject to the constitutional homestead devise restrictions. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:56 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
On appeal the Third District Court, while certifying conflict with Evergrene Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Juan C. Antúnez
If Ross was right, under F.S. 732.401(1) he’d be entitled to one-half of his father’s retained interest in the homestead property. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:15 am by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
Thereafter Westport reopened the county court case and attempted to levy against the sister’s alleged right, title and interest in the property. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:36 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
He had the duty to “administer the trust in good faith, in accordance with … the interests of the beneficiaries,” and to “administer the trust solely in the interests of the beneficiaries. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:15 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
“may have right, title, interest claim in or to the subject property” but any such interest was junior to the mortgage. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:10 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
The bank in preparation of a sale of the unit to a third party requested from the condo association an estoppel certificate complying with Sec. 718.116(1)(b), F.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 2:08 pm by Juan AntĂșnez
Against this backdrop it shouldn’t come as a surprise that Berlinger got hammered on appeal; his key defense — that new F.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:48 pm by Jacek Stramski
An agreement that that upsets this balancing of interests may be invalid. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm by Juan Antunez
On appeal, the 4th DCA reversed both of these orders (which just goes to show that in litigation, as in life, it ain't over 'til it's over). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:27 pm by Juan Antunez
Does a sanctions order under F.S. 57.105 = a fee-shifting order under F.S. 733.106(4)? [read post]