Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. J. D." Results 81 - 100 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
FERC, 520 F.3d 464 (2008), rev’d sub nom. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
”  We cannot do any such thing if someone asks about the “general welfare” or “equal protection. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Abigail Slater
For an answer to this question, it is instructive to look to a 2011 speech by then-FTC Commissioner J. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:09 pm
The Legislature has specifically provided in CPL 170.40 (1) that "in determining whether such compelling factor, consideration, or circumstance exists, the court must, to the extent applicable, examine and consider, individually and collectively, the following: "(a) the seriousness and circumstances of the offense;"(b) the extent of harm caused by the offense;"(c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at trial;"(d) the history, character and condition of the… [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Regarding Items 3.e, 3.f, 3.g, 3.h, 3.j, 3.k, 3.m, 3.n, 4.b, 4.c, 4.d, 4.e, 4.f, 4.g and 4.h, the inadequacy of the response "Unknown" is self-evident. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
I recall appearing before Megarry J in 1974 in what we would now call a TOLATA claim. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Scott A. McKeown
 § 1337 (d)(1) was akin to the factors enumerated in eBay Inc. v. [read post]