Search for: "Intel Corporation, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 4:46 am by Jason Rantanen
Michel and Judge Kathleen O’Malley of the Federal Circuit, Tina Chappell of Intel Corporation, Philip S. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:40 am by Jason Rantanen
  In reaching this conclusion, it distinguished cases involving "programmable" language, such as Intel Corporation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:57 pm
These limitations on the claimed CPU pertain specifically to the processing of stack-based instructions.Nazomi Comm., Inc. at *10-11.Failure to use "programmable" language proves fatal[I]n Intel Corporation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 12:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1999).The cases on which Nazomi relies do not support its position.For example, in Intel Corporation v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Florian Mueller
For now the document is sealed, but the headline has appeared on the electronic document system of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:BRIEF TENDERED from Intel Corporation Title: BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE INTEL CORPORATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:02 am by Pilar G. Kraman
stubid=20311 Testimonials: "Excellent overviews of AIA from those who wrote it, those who will implement it, and those who must live with it" - Graham Douglas, IDDEX (2012) "Assessments and points of view you won't find any place else" - Jim Farmer, Georgetown University (2012) You will network with: Accuray Inc, Americas Bankers Association, Boeing Company, CIENA, Department of Homeland Security, Eldelman, El Cap Ventures, Eli Lilly & Company, Embassy of Canada, Emergent… [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:54 pm by Ken
He has litigated cases against Intel Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., Honda North America, Inc., Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc., BMW of North America, LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Keyes European, LLC, Rusnak Enterprises, LLC and Wells Fargo Auto Finance, Inc. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 10:16 pm by Nietzer
  In September 2010, the Antitrust Division filed a lawsuit against six high technology companies–Adobe Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., Intuit Inc. and Pixar–over a series of bilateral agreements not to solicit each other’s employees. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
” The article discussed a no-poach agreement used by several large high tech companies (Adobe Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., Intuit Inc. and Pixar) to refrain from soliciting the other’s employees. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 1:29 pm by Jeffrey May
That settlement also resolved charges against five other technology companies–Adobe Systems, Inc., Apple, Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corporation, and Pixar. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 12:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
Whether more companies will, like Intel, prove willing to fight the cases remains to be seen. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Raymond Millien
STMicroelectronics Inc., NPEs often file law suits first and then attempt to negotiate a license with the accused infringer/defendant. [read post]