Search for: "J. Mendez"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2020, 3:00 pm
Mendez on May 19. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:36 am
In Mendez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:48 am
Attorney David J. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
Aff. (1693) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 J., Anjanne ... [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:56 pm
Rev. 1053 (2013); Charles Walter Schwartz, “Eighth Amendment Proportionality Analysis and the Compelling Case of William Rummel,” 71 J. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:04 am
They are: J. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Angel Mendez, Defendant-Appellant.2009 WL 2997926, 2009 [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
AURENTZ AND WILLIAM J. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:39 am
• J. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
Alan J. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
Actions like the Greener, Greater Buildings Plan are critical to helping us meet our overall emissions targets," "Mayor Bloomberg is ahead of his time," said Representative Edward J. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Jose Mendez, Defendant-Appellant.2007 WL 4110681(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
Mendez, 68 AD3d 662 [2009]; People v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
., CBP Directive No. 3340-049A, Border Search of Electronic Devices 4– 5 (2018); Molina-Isidoro, 884 F.3d at 294 & n.2 (Costa, J., concurring).] [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:45 am
Gerena-Mendez: 4. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:46 am
Aff. (1693) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
J., Anjanne ... [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 8:39 am
See Espinoza-Cano blog here, Gomez-Mendez blog here, Baza-Martinez blog here, Cannel blog here. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
The Gans defendants sought and obtained an order which set aside the transfers as fraudulent (55 Gans Judgment LLC v Romanoff, Sup Ct, NY County, Feb. 6, 2013, Mendez, J., index No. 106008/2011 [the 55 Gans Judgment order], appeal dismissed 123 AD3d 452 [1st Dept 2014], lv dismissed 26 NY3d 1073 [2015]). [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
See Ronald J. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:32 am
Denying in part the employer’s motion to dismiss, the court also allowed the employee’s interference with the right to take pregnancy leave claim to advance; however, her failure to accommodate claim was dismissed (Graves v Pau Hana Group, LLC dba KJL Fasteners, November 8, 2013, Mendez, J). [read post]
