Search for: "Jacob Hamilton" Results 81 - 100 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Jacobs, 117 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1997) (holding that intent to harm is, in fact, an element of the offense); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
  At the Ogletree Deakins website, Ann Carr Mackey and others focus on the implications of the decision for employee benefits, while at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights Marci Hamilton looks at what the decision will mean for houses of worship and government actions. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
 Other coverage comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today (who has another story focusing on the Chief Justice), from Jeremy Jacobs at Greenwire, where he discusses what the Court’s decision might mean for its ruling in the still-pending Clean Air Act cases, and from the Associated Press, which covers consumers’ reactions to the decisions. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison discusses Kerry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Malvina Halberstam discusses the Court’s recent decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Nancy Leong argues that last week’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
A post in the Quad City Biz Journal titled Prophetstown company wins patent battle shows not all IPRs are filed against trolls.From text within On Jan. 22, in Jacobs Corp. vs. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:37 am by Matthew Harwood
And Jacob Manyong was stopped and placed under arrest after the back tire of his car barely crossed the property of a private business, as he drove out of an adjacent public lot. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, and Leslie Gielow Jacobs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Anne Traum analyzes Monday’s oral argument in the Confrontation Clause case Ohio v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the case comes from Marci Hamilton, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, “whatever the Court does, employers and employees have good reason to demand clearer guidance from Congress. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Scott Dodson discusses his new book on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:34 am by Jim Sedor
Louis Post-Dispatch “Changes Afoot to Tighten Campaign Finance Reporting Laws in Montana” by Mike Dennison for The Missoulian Ethics “Prosecutor: Perry veto forced an end to several cases” by Ross Ramsey and Reeve Hamilton for Texas Tribune [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
”  At In Progress, Colin Starger provides a “doctrinal map” for the case, while at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights Nancy Leong concludes that “several of the justices appeared skeptical of Elonis’ proposed subjective intent test, suggesting that the Court may break its lengthy string of pro-speech rulings. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire, Lisa McElroy at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs previews tomorrow’s oral arguments in Yates v. [read post]