Search for: "John Doe Doyle" Results 81 - 100 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
Bills proposing the “Federal Communications Commission Collaboration Act of 2013” have been introduced in Congress – as S. 245 by Senators Amy Klobuchar, D-MN, and Dean Heller (R-NV) and H.R. 539 by Representatives  Anna Eshoo (D-CA), John Shimkus (R-IL), and Mike Doyle (D-PA). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
When the prosecution addressed the motion, the judge asked “does the US Constitution apply? [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:43 am by Alfred Brophy
 They use citations data from Thomson Reuters' Journal Citations Report (JCR), John Doyle of Washington and Lee, who uses Westlaw's law journal's database, and also the Australian Research Council. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:43 am by Raffaela Wakeman
In addition to Wells’ coverage of the hearings yesterday on Bagram detainees’ access to lawyers, Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers provides a story on the hearings as does Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:25 am by Christen Smith
 Of the Sherlock Holmes mysteries authored by Sir Arrthur Conan Doyle, only The Case Book appears still to be protected under copyright. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:14 am by Rob Robinson
  bit.ly/KtAe2C (John Conte) Is Your Company Website Revealing International Trade Law Violations? [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am by Marissa Miller
Briefly: In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Doyle McManus discusses the possibility that a decision by the Court striking down the Affordable Care Act could be turned into a political victory for President Obama. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:35 am by Larry Bodine
The panel includes: John Barket, Partner, Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLO, Atlanta, GA Diana Anderson, Partner, Carluccio, Leone, Dimon, Doyle & Sacks, LLC, Toms River, NJ Jeff Lantz, Attorney & CEO, Esquire Interactive LLC, Oro Valley, Arizona CLE Program Credit Ethics Credit Requested. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:35 am by Larry Bodine
The panel includes: John Barket, Partner, Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLO, Atlanta, GA Diana Anderson, Partner, Carluccio, Leone, Dimon, Doyle & Sacks, LLC, Toms River, NJ Jeff Lantz, Attorney & CEO, Esquire Interactive LLC, Oro Valley, Arizona CLE Program Credit Ethics Credit Requested. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
  Lyle Denniston at this blog, James Vicini of Reuters, Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers, Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal, Steven D. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
Holland of the Associated Press, Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers (via the Kansas City Star), and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post – agreed that the Court was unlikely to allow inmates to bring their suits in federal courts. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers previews tomorrow’s oral argument in Minneci v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Forensic Science Technician
Joseph Bell  Those who haven’t heard of him may have heard of his student Arthur Conan Doyle. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am by Conor McEvily
  The Associated Press (via the Sacramento Bee), Michael Doyle of the Kansas City Star, and Adam Liptak of the New York Times all have coverage of the cases, as does Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm by royblack
  It reminds me of Arthur Conan Doyle. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am by Bill Merkel
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am by Lisa McElroy
 This short (nine pages) opinion does a good job of demonstrating how the Court goes about interpreting federal statutes; its first step is usually to look, plainly and simply, to the text of the statute. [read post]