Search for: "Jonathan E. Cohen"
Results 81 - 100
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2020, 5:55 am
Berg, Kai Haakon E. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Kai Haakon E. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Molly E. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
Ann E. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
” But, she added, “[w]e may as well not have bothered” because the majority decision “sends a flood of complex state-law issues to federal courts. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
” But, she added, “[w]e may as well not have bothered” because the majority decision “sends a flood of complex state-law issues to federal courts. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Hatcher PovertyLawProf Baltimore Will Hubbard ProfHubbard Baltimore Margaret E. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Kadish: “established traditions and . . . our prior decisions recogniz[e] that the state courts are not bound by Article III, and yet have it within both their power and their proper role to render binding judgments on issues of federal law, subject only to review by this Court. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
From the Right and from the Left, legislatures are considering—and in many cases enacting—laws that have no meaningful chance of surviving judicial challenge under the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
[W]e cannot say that the Framers used the word ‘try’ as an implied limitation on the method by which the Senate might proceed in trying impeachments. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm
Cox of Gibson Dunn, Michael E. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
New York: Times Books, 2012.Busch, Nathan E. and Daniel H. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
” At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen looks at the cert petition in Acklin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In our last column, we explored some threshold justiciability issues (focusing on the plaintiff’s standing to sue in federal court) in the recent federal lawsuit by a Texas-based nonprofit organization—Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP)—against Harvard Law Review (HLR), challenging HLR’s use of race and gender in selecting members and also in selecting authors for publication. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
For many law students, membership in and service on an academic journal is a highlight of the law school experience. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Cohen. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
New York: Harper Collins, 2016.Cohen, Stanley. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
This three-part series looks at intriguing constitutional questions raised by California’s statutory enactment of SB 826, which requires publicly held corporations with principal executive offices located in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Two weeks ago, in Part One of this series, we began to analyze some of the intriguing constitutional questions raised by California’s enactment of SB 826, a statute that requires publicly held corporations with principal executive offices in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Earlier this week, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB 826, a landmark measure that requires each publicly held corporation whose principal executive offices are located in California to have, by the end of 2019, at least one woman on its board of directors. [read post]
