Search for: "Jones v. May et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
California Bound: Slavery on the New Frontier, an exhibit curated by Tyree Boyd-Pates and Taylor Bythewood-Porter, is at the California African American Museum in Los Angeles through April 28.I'm grateful to Virginia Law's Aditya Bamzai for posting his amicus brief in PDR Network et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Ville de Montréal (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal), 2018 QCCS 5639 [23] En raison de la position prise par la Ville de Montréal dès le début du dossier et de son comportement depuis, la présente demande en irrecevabilité est manifestement mal fondée, déraisonnable et abusive au sens de l’article 54 C.p.c.[11]. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
LaFave, et al., Criminal Procedure § 19.2(e) (4th ed. 2015). [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 11:44 am
Robert Joseph Kernweis, et al(Disciplinary Proceeding No. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
(mem. op.); also see Foster v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Plaintiffs’ counsel, Dickie Scruggs, et al., withdrew her before the defense could conduct an examination before trial. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
The National Collegiate MasterStudent Trust et al, dated Oct. 19, 2018 (pdf). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:00 am
Ranch Company, et al. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 267, 273. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm
World Programming Ltd., 874 F. 3d 370 (4th.Cir.2017) College of Optometrists of Ontario et al v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm
Parks v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:54 am
No appellate court had ever addressed this question until the Eleventh Circuit did so last week in Mickles et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
Schmitz, et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
In Van Horn, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
If one partner in a workplace romance has authority over the other, there’s a chance their motivations are, or may be characterized as, something other than purely consensual. [read post]
