Search for: "K-V Pharmaceutical Company"
Results 81 - 100
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
K-V Pharm. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:04 pm
S. 90-91(k)(6). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
SJS/TEN is somewhat analogous in our sandbox to mesothelioma in asbestos cases, since plaintiffs often work backwards from the diagnosis to look for some drug company to sue. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am
For example, in its 2004 Form 10-K, Omnicare stated: We believe our contract arrangements with other healthcare providers, our pharmaceutical suppliers and our pharmacy practices are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
In Christopher v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 523 A.2d 374 (Pa. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Salim Shah and his companies Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sarfez USA, Inc. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The sessions of the conference covered a wide range of pressing issues, from theories concerning the rule of law and judicial reform, through subject matters that include company law, international sales law, labour law and criminal law. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am
For example, in its 2004 Form 10-K, Omnicare stated: We believe our contract arrangements with other healthcare providers, our pharmaceutical suppliers and our pharmacy practices are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Bogan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:02 am
State Bd. of Inv. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Mutual Pharmaceutical, U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
Courts overwhelmingly apply both the learned intermediary rule and comment k in the same fashion to drugs and medical devices. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
Hurt v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Sebastian Wiradharma a/k/a Sebastian Singh ("Singh") and Singpet Pte. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs had no response save a rather silly one – that there is no instance of the FDA striking a black box warning used by a pharmaceutical company. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
By itself, off-label promotion is no more causal than, as we commented the other day, a “video of a company employee kicking his dog. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:46 pm
” Ganesh Raghu, Kevin K. [read post]