Search for: "Kelly v. Administrator"
Results 81 - 100
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 2:04 pm
Chief Justice Kelly dissented, joined by Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:01 pm
Drug Enforcement Administration and U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 11:10 pm
R.V. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:16 am
Applying the confidentiality provisions of Civil Rights Law §50-aMatter of Crowe v Kelly, 38 AD3d 435Kieran Crowe, a New York City police lieutenant, was served with a notice of discipline setting out disciplinary charges and specifications based on allegations made by two of the sergeants he supervised. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Griffin v Walters, 83 AD2d 618.Although the Department argued that “the technical rules of evidence need not be complied with in disciplinary proceedings before administrative bodies,” the court said that the deficiency in the proof of the Department’s efforts to effect service in Lima “goes beyond the lack of technical compliance. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:19 pm
A brief overview of the case Krimstock v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Claimant administratively appealed, and the decision was upheld on review by the County. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Claimant administratively appealed, and the decision was upheld on review by the County. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
Kelly(SCOTUSwiki description here), which is an important concerning standards of review under AEDPA. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:52 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
As the court ruled in Kelly v Levin, 440 NY2d 424, acquitting an employee in an administrative disciplinary action is a reversible error if the individual previously was found guilty of a criminal act based on the same allegations. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Halchak v Dorrance Township Board of Supervisors, 2019 WL 4794773 (MD PA 8/30/2019) [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
”Citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, rearg denied 96 NY2d 854, the Appellate Division concluded that the penalty imposed, termination, was not "so disproportionate to the offense[s] as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" and thus did not constitute an abuse of discretion and dismissed Tamsen’s appeal.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00785.htm _______________________The Discipline Book - A… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Its only leeway available to the administrative tribunal is in recommending or imposing a penalty.The decision in Kelly [Kelly v Levin, 440 NYS2d 424] illustrates this point. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
It is styled, Spurlock v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
SRO Paul Kelly has uniformly sided with the districts on these cases. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:55 am
& Ors v R. [2007] EWCA Crim 1925 (30 July 2007) Saleem, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 1923 (27 July 2007) Rafferty v R [2007] EWCA Crim 1898 (26 July 2007) El-Kurd & Ors, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 1888 (26 July 2007) High Court (Administrative Court) Kelly, R (on the application of) v Warley Magistrates Court & Anor [2007] EWHC 1836 (Admin) (31 July 2007) Corby Borough Council, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am
In People v Gregg, Justice Kelly dissented from the denial of the application stating that she would vacate the defendant’s sentence because the trial court erroneously punished defendant for exercising his constitutional and statutory rights by assessing 10 points for OV 19 (interference with the administration of justice). [read post]
