Search for: "Keys v. Duke University" Results 81 - 100 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Relatedly, when a company loses key senior IT security personnel, it is not only a red flag but also an opportunity for a board to examine succession plans and to obtain an unbiased, albeit possibly disgruntled, view of any cybersecurity flaws. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The ruling is made that much worse because the Court had before it an example of how the situation should have been handled, in the case of NCTQ v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  It is a key and indispensable component of our system of copyright, as the Supreme Court has reminded us many times (E.g., Campbell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm by Ryke Longest
Ryke Longest is the Director of the Environmental Law and Policy Clinic and a Clinical Professor of Law at the Duke University School of Law. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:41 am by Jason Rantanen
ApotexPanel: Prost (author), Reyna, and Chen (dissenting in part) Allergan and Duke University hold a pair of patents relating to an ophthalmic solution used as a treatment for eyebrow hair loss. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
,” defendant separately emailed the Provost and the President of Duke University, as well as Goranson’s supervisor at the library, complaining about Goranson’s purported internet attacks on Professor Golb and suggesting that they consider whether this conduct was appropriate for a Duke employee. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:32 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
What happens if, on the other hand, Duke University Press wins the case or otherwise retains control over the journal? [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
In 1986 he had argued and won a unanimous decision in a key Voting Rights Act case,Thornberg v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:50 am by Thomas Kaufman
Kralowec retorted that the Seventh Circuit had advanced a narrower reading of Dukes in RBS Citizens NA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Festinger: Duke Nukem case: yes, they should. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am by Alfred Brophy
 Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]