Search for: "King Enterprises, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
United States, a “clear enough” — as opposed to, perhaps, a crystal clear — Chevron step one inquiry. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
The pressures of globalisation on the Japanese economy and intellectual property (Thomson Reuters Scientific) Kenya BrandKenya: the task of branding Kenya’s exports (IP Kenya) Lithuania Commission refuses PGI protection to Džiugas cheese, refuses PDO and PGI status for Germantas cheese (Class 46) South Africa South Africa’s new Deputy President an IP expert (Afro-IP) Spain Delimiting the border between trade mark and unfair… [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
In King v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Sebelius), textual statutory interpretation (King v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
This suggestion appears to confuse the frequentist enterprise for evaluating evidence on the basis of statistical measures of the probability of observing at least as great a departure from expected in a sample rather than attempting to affixing a probability to the population parameter. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/SZM Life Partners, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
“These elements must be established by clear and convincing evidence” (Jones v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 2:38 pm
Copyright Office released Part 2 of its report, Copyright and Artificial Intelligence: Copyrightability (“the 2025 Report”) providing a detailed legal and policy analysis of how copyright law applies to AI-generated content.[1] Part 2 builds on foundational principles of copyright law, reaffirming that human authorship remains the cornerstone of copyright protection in the United States.[2] It provides critical guidance on the conditions under which AI-assisted works… [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
The Supreme Court of British Columbia wrestled with this very issue in a recent decision in Thomas and Saik’uz First Nation v Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
Loving Care Agency, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Kane Agency, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
