Search for: "King Enterprises, Inc. v. the United States" Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
United States, a “clear enough” — as opposed to, perhaps, a crystal clear — Chevron step one inquiry. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
The pressures of globalisation on the Japanese economy and intellectual property (Thomson Reuters Scientific)   Kenya BrandKenya: the task of branding Kenya’s exports (IP Kenya)   Lithuania Commission refuses PGI protection to Džiugas cheese, refuses PDO and PGI status for Germantas cheese (Class 46)   South Africa South Africa’s new Deputy President an IP expert (Afro-IP)   Spain Delimiting the border between trade mark and unfair… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
This suggestion appears to confuse the frequentist enterprise for evaluating evidence on the basis of statistical measures of the probability of observing at least as great a departure from expected in a sample rather than attempting to affixing a probability to the population parameter. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“These elements must be established by clear and convincing evidence” (Jones v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of British Columbia wrestled with this very issue in a recent decision in Thomas and Saik’uz First Nation v Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]