Search for: "Lacking v. State of Mississippi" Results 81 - 100 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 5:09 pm by Gregory Ablavsky
After all, Georgia was one of the original states, and the Supreme Court had ruled that it lacked jurisdiction in Indian country. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfEarlier today the Supreme Court granted review in two cases that pose the same question: "Should this Court overrule Grutter v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
In 1979 the Mississippi legislature, like many other states, adopted CON laws. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 11:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Carlton Reeves denied the motion today, "essentially for the reasons stated in the defendant's opposition brief[]," which points to various procedural defects in the motion (and in particular the lack of legal argument). [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In allowing abortion providers to sue only a narrow set of state officials, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
“The underlying constitutional issue is whether the State can resolve these philosophic questions in such a definitive way that a woman lacks all choice in the matter,” except perhaps in “rare circumstances. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallDuring the Supreme Court's oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 1:06 pm by Marc Antonetti and Scott McIntyre
Indeed, on Nov. 23, 2021, one Mississippi federal district court denied relief, on the particular facts of that case, to a number of Mississippi State University employees who challenged the federal contractor vaccine mandate in Hollis v. [read post]