Search for: "Lamar v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:18 pm
By Hilary Lamar The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:40 pm
United States holding that Padilla v Kentucky decided in 2010 was not retroactive; thereby depriving non-citizens of the protections afforded those defendants who pled guilty without being properly counseled about the deportation consequences of their guilty pleas in the past. [read post]
11 May 2013, 11:36 am by Schachtman
  A political (or a religious) worldview places core commitments above empirical data, as was so clearly revealed in the case of The Vatican v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:17 pm by Danielle Beach-Oswald
  The 3 or 10 year bar has been in place because of the illegal presence of these individuals in the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
(3) An examination of whether notorious foreign infringers have attempted to or succeeded in accessing capital markets in the United States for funding or public offerings [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:53 am by Conor McEvily
”  In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor Arjun Sethi discusses United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm by Ryan Radia
The part about websites “subject to seizure in the United States” refers to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Remote sellers are exempt from collection obligations if they have less than $500,00 per year in sales in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:57 pm by Ryan Radia
Could this provision cause courts to revisit the willfulness standard discussed in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  The changes further made the novelty defeating acts available wherever they occur in the world, thereby removing requirements related to occurrences in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011, the first significant change to the United States patent system has arrived. [read post]