Search for: "Lippman .v Lippman" Results 81 - 100 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2011, 8:17 am by Eric Turkewitz
A few of my prior postings on the subject as we put this issue to bed for awhile: Kaye v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The court also noted that the Village was not barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from terminating Plaintiff’s post-retirement health care benefits.In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a Taylor Law… [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Following the release of orders, the Court will hear argument in Peake. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:40 am
Vogel, authored by our new Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, came after a plaintiff's verdict of $1.5M in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 1:43 am
NY's Top Court Says Individual Jury Poll Required New York's top court ruled Tuesday (Duffy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 The Court of Appeals, in People v Clermont (2013 NY Slip Op 06806 [10/22/13]) the defense suppression motion said defendant had been stopped due to an MVA when no car was involved. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
In it he discusses Robert Belton's The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Margaret Harding McGill and Daniel Lippman, Politico, on reports of new White House executive order] Tags: Google, social media, YouTube [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:13 pm by James Eckert
On February 15th, the Court of Appeals decided People v Rabb and People v Mason (_NY3d_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01050 [2/15/11]). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:57 am by Imke Ratschko
New York's Highest Court has recently said, no, a business is not liable for the defamatory comment of a visitor on its blog  (Shiamili v. [read post]