Search for: "Local Trademarks v. Powers"
Results 81 - 100
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
The amendments preempt conflicting local laws effective immediately (new 1798.199) but delay AG enforcement as much as six months to July 1, 2020 (or sooner, if the AG gets its regs out before January 1, 2020) (1798.185(c)). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
., v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
“Common branding” means a shared name, servicemark, or trademark. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
Tam, the government argued unsuccessfully that it could ban "offensive" trademarks because issuing a trademark is government speech. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
Tam, the government argued unsuccessfully that it could ban "offensive" trademarks because issuing a trademark is government speech. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
But the Texas Constitution’s insistence on limited government also matters, and that vision of enumerated powers and personal liberty becomes quaint once courts (perhaps owing to an off-kilter grasp of ‘judicial activism’) decide the Legislature has limitless power to declare its actions justified by police power. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
These amendments modified provisions regarding patents, designs, utility models, trademarks and appellations of origin (AOs). [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the Housing Act 2004, s 67, which empowers a local authority licensing a house in multiple occupation (HMO) to impose conditions regulating the use or occupation of the house, includes the power to limit the category of person for whom the HMO is suitable – eg students. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am
The successor’s use of the employer’s intangible assets—its name, goodwill, trademarks, customer data, trade secrets, phone numbers, and websites—plus its retention of principals to promote the successor to customers, weighed heavily in favor of successor liability (Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Benefit Fund v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 7:38 pm
All the lawyers in the Brett Kimberlin v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 7:58 am
Google Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
All the lawyers in the Brett Kimberlin v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
