Search for: "Long v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration"
Results 81 - 100
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Debt collection employee need not have knowledge of entity that created third-party records as long he can say he received them (Duh!) [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
What’s this about the “Commissioner of Social Security” and claims arising under subchapter II? [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
Internet and Social Media After Elon Musk told workers at Twitter to prepare for “long hours at high intensity”, staff members have been leaving in droves, Reuters reports. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
Administrative segregation and other forms of long-term solitary are prone to particular forms of abuse and have been scrutinized in the US and Canada in recent years. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As FCC Commissioners, we are deeply concerned that Big Tech’s expansive position threatens free speech and is inconsistent with the nation’s communications regulatory framework. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
United States: Congress funds Social Security by taxing both employers and employees under FICA on the wages employees earn. ... [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
Of course, people may differ on what these mean even as both business and public administrators battle over details. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
A majority of Commissioners, however, is of the view that such a solution would still suffer from many of the current administrative inadequacies. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
On Monday 5 October 2020, there was a hearing before Mann J in the long running Mirror Phone Hacking Litigation. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
”** The court noted that Retirement and Social Security Law §40(c)(9), provides that a retired public employee entitled to public pension benefits who subsequently accepts a new public service position is considered to be an active member of the retirement system only if the pension benefits to which he or she is entitled are suspended during his or her active membership. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
