Search for: "Lujan v. Lujan"
Results 81 - 100
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 9:52 pm
The court rejected the company’s reliance on Lujan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
For instance, his contention that the purportedly “excess” fee award would cause Volkswagen to pass costs along to customers failed to satisfy the “irreducible minimum” of an actual or imminent injury for Article III standing under the leading case on standing in federal courts, Lujan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
Sharp Healthcare, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2010) and Durrell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
The 4th Circuit reviewed the determination that Lansdowne had standing in its own right to challenge the Exclusivity Order applying the test originally announced in Lujan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
The 4th Circuit reviewed the determination that Lansdowne had standing in its own right to challenge the Exclusivity Order applying the test originally announced in Lujan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:09 am
These were discussed in Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife... 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
" Lujan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
Lujan, 2012 U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Lujan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:23 am
INS, 267 F.3d 996 (9th Cir. 2001); Lujan-Armendariz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:20 am
The question then becomes whether the action under Rule 75 in the trial court satisfies Hallsmith’s due process rights.The SCOTUS held in Lujan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:08 am
” Lujan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:52 am
Supreme Court in Lujan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
See Lujan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
Lujan, 960 F.2d 89, 91 (9th Cir. 1992). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:42 am
FWIW, the US Supreme Court case cited by McCraw (City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
Lujan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:34 am
I just don't see how this case meets the Lujan requirements for standing. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
” Consumer Watchdog, 753 F.3d at 1260–61 (citing Lujan v. [read post]
