Search for: "MARCUS v. MARCUS" Results 81 - 100 of 1,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Marcus, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2044.1 at 575–76 (2d ed. 1994), and stating: “We conclude that we have jurisdiction to address the merits of the challenged order of the district court. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
What links Jaswat Singh Chail, William Joyce a.k.a Lord Haw Haw, and Marcus Sarjaent? [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
Beyond her Supreme Court advocacy, Marcus was an influential lawyer in other ways. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
IPSO 02303-22 A woman v gloucestershirelive, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09504-22 Hunter v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), No breach – after investigation 09505-22 Hunter v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 12008-22 A man v mylondon.news, 1… [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am by Zak Gowen
By Simon Yeung and Johanna Hoyos In a radical move, Mr Justice Marcus Smith is ushering in a new disclosure option in England by ordering “massive over-disclosure” of documents by the parties in Genius Sports Technologies Ltd v Soft Construct (Malta) Ltd. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
And finally, I gave an interview to Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post which resulted in this passage in her opinion essay on the coming Supreme Court term: "Fearless. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As explained in the April Order, plaintiffs allocution defeats any claim that she misunderstood its terms, and therefore, defendants’ actions could not have caused her damages (see Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P. [read post]