Search for: "MARRIAGE OF EVANS"
Results 81 - 100
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
When the plaintiff does not show up for trial, the case gets dismissed for want of prosecution or as it’s called in Texas – DWOPPED [pronounced “dee-whopped”]; when the Defendant does not appear, a default judgment will typically be entered, assuming the Plaintiff supports its claim with evidence, normally in the form of a business records affidavit in debt collection cases, rather than a live witness. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
When the plaintiff does not show up for trial, the case gets dismissed for want of prosecution or as it’s called in Texas – DWOPPED [pronounced “dee-whopped”]; when the Defendant does not appear, a default judgment will typically be entered, assuming the Plaintiff supports its claim with evidence, normally in the form of a business records affidavit in debt collection cases, rather than a live witness. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
The following is a series of questions on the occasion of the publication of Ronald Collins and David Skover’s “The Judge: 26 Machiavellian Lessons” (Oxford University Press, 2017). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at the cert petition in Evans v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
For example, if a male employee marries a woman and maintains his job despite the marriage, but a female employee marries a woman and is terminated because that marriage, the female employee could demonstrate that her termination would not have occurred “but for” her female gender. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
For example, if a male employee marries a woman and maintains his job despite the marriage, but a female employee marries a woman and is terminated because that marriage, the female employee could demonstrate that her termination would not have occurred “but for” her female gender. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:02 am
Evans v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” Briefly: At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen discusses the pending cert petition in Evans v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am
Evans, the court invalidated an amendment to the Colorado Constitution, adopted by statewide referendum, that prohibited all government action designed to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:24 am
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Virginia, permitting interracial marriage, and on a series of more recent decisions by the Justices broadening gay rights under the Constitution – including the ruling two years ago in favor of same-sex marriage. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:26 am
Virginia, which held that state laws banning interracial marriages are unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
For the first time, a federal appeals court held squarely that Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Gividen for compiling the cases in this post, and to Evan Young for the “Imminence” joke. ============================================================ Returning Relists Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
This is because in the case of those privileges, either a professional rule of confidentiality (for attorneys and priests) or a custom of privacy (in marriage) already protects the secrecy of the communications at issue, and the privilege simply ensures that the pre-existing privacy protection does not suffer from the lack of a corresponding privilege. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
Also, in a partial dissent and separate concurrence, the judges staged a robust debate about the relationship between sexual orientation as a status and gender nonconformity as a behavior (Evans v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
And other gay individuals choose to enter mixed-orientation marriages. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
And other gay individuals choose to enter mixed-orientation marriages. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
And other gay individuals choose to enter mixed-orientation marriages. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 4:45 pm
Tickets available from here https://t.co/qE3wQKpFoY or read more here https://t.co/9hijcsNXRj — transparency project (@seethrujustice) March 3, 2017 The Transparency Project published their response to the IPSO consultation on the Editors Handbook (also known as ‘the Code’) here See also Sir Harold Evans on ‘disgraceful’ Google and Facebook and his support for Section 40/Impress in the Press Gazette last week. [read post]
