Search for: "MERCK & CO V US" Results 81 - 100 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2013, 1:57 pm
Merck & Co., 948 A.2d 587, 595 (N.J. 2008) (citations omitted).14  Bailey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:16 pm by Heidee Stoller
The plaintiff investors in Merck & Co. v Reynolds alleged that Merck & Co. knowingly misrepresented the heart attack risks associated with Vioxx. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Singulair (Montelukast) – US: Merck &;amp; Co’s Singulair patent challenged on $50K bounty (Patent Baristas) (GenericsWeb)   General Docs at BIO (Panel addresses narrowing scope of biotech patents – Patent Docs),… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Singulair (Montelukast) – US: Merck &;amp; Co’s Singulair patent challenged on $50K bounty (Patent Baristas) (GenericsWeb)   General Docs at BIO (Panel addresses narrowing scope of biotech patents – Patent Docs),… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See id. at 426; In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:30 pm by Barry Barnett
As we predicted, see Merck Lawyer Takes Nicks on Question of Timely Securities Complaint in Supreme Court, the Supreme Court in 2010 agreed with us in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
(Patent Docs) Sitagliptin – Germany: Federal Patent Court referral concerning SPCs: C-125/10 - Merck & Co Inc v Deutsche Patent- und Markenamt (The SPC blog) Thalomid (Thalidomide) – US: Celgene, Barr resolve patent dispute over generic Thalomid (Patent Docs) Ultram (Tramadol) – US: Pharma Products L.P. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"They have a very large product line," he says.However, in view of the product lines which have been implicated, the problem of false marking is a bit more complicated:Defendants include companies such as Procter & Gamble, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Cisco Systems, Scientific-Atlanta, Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc., 3M Co., DirecTV, Medtronic Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
(photo:  Vioxx back in the day . . . . ) We were just talking the other day at the IP ADR Blog about the power of contingent agreements to settle lawsuits in connection with the recent Verizon/Vonage settlement here.Now its the turn of another BIG &;quot;V" LAWSUIT -- Merck's Vioxx litigation -- to benefit itself with the largest drug settlement ever but only in the event 85%… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
(photo:  Vioxx back in the day . . . . ) We were just talking the other day at the IP ADR Blog about the power of contingent agreements to settle lawsuits in connection with the recent Verizon/Vonage settlement here.Now its the turn of another BIG &;quot;V" LAWSUIT -- Merck's Vioxx litigation -- to benefit itself with the largest drug settlement ever but only in the event 85%… [read post]