Search for: "MacDonald v. MacDonald" Results 81 - 100 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 5:26 am
"He went on to point out (at paragraph 10) that no gloss should be placed upon on the words of the rules other than to say that "real" means that the prospect of success must be realistic rather than fanciful (see Tanfern Limited v Cameron MacDonald [2000] 1 WLR 1311).In the present case, he was satisfied that the appeal had a real prospect of success, and therefore granted permission to appeal (paragraph 13). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Subsequently, in Centre Ice Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 12:33 pm by Michel-Adrien
York U – And All Eyes Over to York U for What's Next (Excess Copyright blog, July 14, 2017)The Federal Court of Canada Puts the “Fair” in the Copyright Act’s “Fair Dealing” Exceptions (McInnes Cooper analysis on CanLII Connects, July 18, 2017)Court Ruling on York's Copyright Infringements a  Win for Canadian Creators (Macdonald-Laurier Institute, July 18, 2017)Students Deeply Concerned With Federal Court Ruling Against York University… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employees Leave the Same Old Employer for the Same New Employer In Morgan Canada Corporation v MacDonald, Morgan Canada Corporation (“Morgan”) sought an injunction against two former employees “MacDonald” and “Di Nardo”, MacDonald’s wife “Caroline”, and Reefer Sales and Service (Toronto) Incorporated (“Reefer”), the company for which both MacDonald and Di Nardo had left Morgan. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employees Leave the Same Old Employer for the Same New Employer In Morgan Canada Corporation v MacDonald, Morgan Canada Corporation (“Morgan”) sought an injunction against two former employees “MacDonald” and “Di Nardo”, MacDonald’s wife “Caroline”, and Reefer Sales and Service (Toronto) Incorporated (“Reefer”), the company for which both MacDonald and Di Nardo had left Morgan. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:47 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Khyam & Ors,R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1612 (23 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Handi-Craft Company & Anor v B Free World Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 868 (30 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Dadourian Group International Inc & Ors v Simms & Ors [2008] EWHC 1784 (Ch) (25 July 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smith v Skanska Construction Services Ltd [2008]… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
MacDonald to remind him of the obvious,” Saunders wrote. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]