Search for: "MacMillan v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
The case has been pending for several years before Second Circuit Court Judge Denny Chin under Authors Guild v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The trial of El Naschie v MacMillan Publishers Ltd began before Sharp J (without a jury) on Monday 31 October 2011. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
MacMillan Bloedel (Sask.) [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Trus Joist MacMillan, 2004 WL 524898, at *13 n.26 (D. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
This was in the case of Sienna Miller v News Group. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:12 am
” Apple sought a petition of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court in October 2015. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
ChildrenK639 .H65 2010Children's rights in international politics : the transformative power of discourse / Anna Holzscheiter.Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
MacMillan [2003] B.C.J. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am
MacMillan, 894 F.2d at 583 (2d Cir. 1990). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:51 pm
MacMillan, 894 F.2d at 583 (2d Cir. 1990). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am
MacMillan, 894 F.2d at 583 (2d Cir. 1990). [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
As already mentioned, on 6 July 2012, Sharp J gave the long awaited judgment in El-Naschie v Macmillan, ([2012] EWHC1809 (QB)) heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am
New York : London : Stockton Press ; Macmillan Reference, 1998 3 v. : ill. ; 27 cm. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
On Sunday, Guido Fawkes released a preview of Alastair Campbell’s evidence to the Inquiry, stating that he had acquired it by “legal means”. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:01 am
However, support for the decision could lie in Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust (No 3), [1996] 1 WLR 387 (CA), which the court does mention (see for example para. 126), which stresses the possibility of characterizing a specific legal issue within the context of a broader claim. [read post]
