Search for: "Mark A. Sales v. State of Indiana" Results 81 - 100 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
§§ 1114, 1116, 1117, 1125(a) and (c); trademark infringement and unfair competition under the common law of the State of Indiana; and forgery under Indiana Code § 35- 43-5-2(b) as well as counterfeiting under Indiana Code § 35-43-5-2(a), pursuant to Indiana Code § 34-24-3-1. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  In other words, because manufacturers profit from the sale of their products, it is appropriate for them to answer for injuries caused by defects in those products. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm by Steve Baird
About four years ago brand owners scored a major victory in LSU v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
Courts – http://bit.ly/LxQPgy (Thomas Gleason) Risks in Big Data Attract Big Law Firms – http://bit.ly/PyHPgi (Monica Bay) Scrapping Client Access Licensing for Multi-Mailbox Search is Welcome Change – http://bit.ly/LvO27z (John Mello) Smartphone Email Signatures - http://bit.ly/LMkHpy (Beverly Michaelis) Social Media: Risk Management - http://onforb.es/PpZMgY (Ken Makovsky) Ten Steps To IT Transformation – http://bit.ly/PDXjzr - (Chuck… [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:09 am by Paul Freehling
Rolls-Royce Corp., 663 F.3d 966, 972 (8th Cir. 2011) (Indiana and Missouri law) (this case was the subject of a recent Seyfarth Shaw trade secrets blog); Tewari De-Ox Syst. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
(US District Court, Indiana ND,10 Aug. 2011) dealt with the issue of the disciplining of students for posting racy photographs on Facebook. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:34 am by Venkat
Tigerlogic dispute over the "POST POST" mark for "social search services" touches on this: "Social Search Services Duel Over "Post Post" Mark -- Boathouse Group v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]