Search for: "Mark Hunt"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
So now we basically have a witch hunt in cyberspace as well. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
Enerco’s registered marks include Portable Buddy, Hunting Buddy, and Big Buddy. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm
But a new report published by the House Natural Resources Committee Democratic staff, titled “Missing the Mark: African trophy hunting fails to show consistent conservation benefits,” challenges these false claims. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
The last time a Midwestern state considered dove hunting was in 2006, when Michigan voters were asked to approve a new dove hunting season after a century of dove protection. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 8:42 am
Anderson appeared first on Law Offices of Daniel Hunt. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:14 am
The RINO feeds on corruption, and is marked by the stripes of cowardice. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:06 am
Defendants counterclaimed for cancellation of the Red October marks based on fraud on the PTO, as well as some other things. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Mark Lemley cited Cecil Quillen early on in the Northwestern Law Review article on rational ignorance. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:29 am
For example, colors may provide ornamentation, or may serve to allow a product to blend in with its surroundings (camouflage for hunting gear) or indicate a product’s flavor (yellow for lemon). [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 10:01 am
Hunt. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:20 am
Applicant pointed to one third-party registration for a similar design for clothing, but that dog wouldn't hunt: there was no evidence as to whether that mark is in use, or whether the consuming public has any familiarity with it.As to the registered word mark, the wording in the applied-for mark is essentially equivalent. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:20 am
–Written by Virginia Hunt, Hunt Law Office [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:14 am
Information and commentary is provided by Dallas/Fort Worth Personal Injury Lawyer Mark Anderson. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:57 am
The Board upheld Section 2(e)(3) geographic deceptiveness refusals of the mark shown here (with COPENHAGEN disclaimed) for “tableware, namely, forks, knives, spoons, razors; hunting knives” in Class 8 and “household or kitchen utensils and containers; glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes” in Class 21. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
The dish is the dessert called "Hunting for truffles" ("Vamos a buscar trufas").The concept of this dessert is spectacular: the client has to hunt for truffles (with the real dedicated instrument) through leaves, grass and soil. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 11:28 am
I assumed upon moving here this was the marking of irresponsible dog owners. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:35 pm
A sarcastic question, by Freeman Hunt, in the comments to last night's post, which was about a Jeffrey Toobin piece in The New Yorker that savaged Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for not speaking during oral argument. [read post]
