Search for: "Mark v. Long"
Results 81 - 100
of 8,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2020, 7:27 am
Because, cutting a long story short, Sky's trade mark covers computer software, questions arise about whether that is acceptable. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
" Hallstrom v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:15 am
"Applicant pointed to Red Carpet Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:37 pm
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:28 am
Tacking, however, is only permitted as long as the modified trademark establishes "the same, continuing commercial impression so that consumers consider both as the same mark. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:43 am
Moab Indus. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
41 In that regard, the fact that the sign in question could be denied registration on the basis of a number of grounds for refusal is irrelevant so long as any one of those grounds fully applies to that sign. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
In Amazing Spaces, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:27 am
Honestly, I didn’t see this as one that would take this long. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 12:54 am
The long weekend round-up looks a little something like this (updating throughout the weekend):Press reports note Daryl Holton, a volunteer in Tennessee, has chosen to die by electrocution marking the second time this year an inmate has affirmatively chosen to die by the electric chair.The Green Bay Press-Gazette has a great piece about the all to often race to the bottom in indigent criminal defense. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm
Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
V. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:43 am
Referring to C-500/14 - Ford v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:46 pm
Chocolaterie Guylian N.V. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2009] FCA 891 '); //--> [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
In a recent Monroe County decision in the case of Smith v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
In New Breed of Patent Claim Bedevils Product Makers , DIONNE SEARCEY covered aspects of the false patent marking issue found in the Federal Circuit case Stauffer v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
But is a mark with such broad public recognition a strong brand? [read post]
