Search for: "Matter of Clark"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
Clark v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
Clark v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:43 am
A Republican House member was quoted describing Trump as "the Orange Jesus," while a text written by one of his colleagues on December 30, 2020, made the news with this description of now-indicted Trump coup plotter Jeffrey Clark: "You are the man. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:43 am
This event will present an update on significant state indirect tax issues with a focus on sales/use tax, plus unclaimed property and property tax matters. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
One of the central differences between delinquency matters and criminal matters is that juvenile records are not subject to public inspection. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:42 am
But Daniels’ attorney Clark Brewster at the time still had a pending complaint against Tacopina with the grievance committee, which also failed. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am
The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) once reflected on the persistence of the ethos of knightly honor, which meant for him people who were, in the 19th century, still disposed to engage in dueling, or a private act of combat to settle a matter of slighted respect. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:34 am
The endless flurry of pleadings (by my count eight last Thursday) in the Jeffrey Clark D.C. bar discipline matter includes Disciplinary Counsel's objection to the adequacy of Respondent's witness disclosures and, more significantly, the relevance of his apparent desire to... [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The claimant successfully claimed infringement and the invalidity of the defendant’s registrations before HHJ Melissa Clarke sitting in the IPEC.The long history of the parties’ joint presence on the UK market clearly added a degree of complexity to the judgment, which contains a detailed review of each side’s business over the years. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
TRUMP-LEGAL MATTERS A federal appeals court in Washington appeared to indicate yesterday that it would retain at least some version of the gag order against former President Donald Trump in the criminal investigation accusing him of trying to overturn the 2020 election. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
“Near the end of the photo op, I had a back and forth with President Trump when the matter of Arizona came up,” Chesebro is quoted as saying in his proffer. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
” Senators endorsed Clark’s understanding the betraying the oath of office was the lynchpin of Section Three disqualification. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:15 am
While Apple asserted that the settlement does not constitute an admission of any unlawful activity, the agreement resolves all pending matters between the DOJ and Apple relating to the investigation. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:39 am
In 1978, the Secretary-General of the General Synod (William Pattinson) sent the House of Bishops draft, for advice, to the chair of the General Synod Standing Orders Committee (Oswald Clark). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
On Thursday 26 October 2023 there was a hearing on meaning in the defamation case of Noel Clarke v Guardian News and Media. 5RB have more information here. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
After 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement and heightened awareness of systemic racism have amplified these voices and led to renewed calls for removal. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 8:12 am
A District of Columbia Hearing Committee that presides over the Jeffrey Clark bar discipline matter has issued an opinion to the Board on Professional Responsibility recommending that the Board deny Clark's request to defer the proceeding pending resolution of the... [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 3:14 pm
There has been a flurry of pleadings filed in the Jeffrey Clark bar discipline matter in the District of Columbia over the past two days. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:13 pm
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact MCDH at (815) 334-4510. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Where the law requires only that the defendant have intentionally acted in some way, it does not matter that the defendant believed in good faith--whether on the basis of counsel's advice or for some other reason--that the conduct was legal. [read post]
