Search for: "Matter of Adoption of David C."
Results 81 - 100
of 721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
” The court continued:Dobbs is now the law of the land; and this [c]ourt and every other court in America are bound to apply it faithfully and completely. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:14 am
Contact Us: Twitter: @gebauerm or @glambert Voicemail: 713-487-7821 Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com Music: Jerry David DeCicca Transcript Greg Lambert 0:07 Welcome to The Geek in Review. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:55 am
Second, the involvement of Eritrean forces in support of the Federal Government further complicates matters. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
"[C]ourts should not 'uphold every modern law that remotely resembles a historical analogue,' because doing so 'risk[s] endorsing outliers that our ancestors would never have accepted.'" Id. [read post]
Tax Policy Colloquium for November 15: Goldburn Maynard's Biden's Gambit and Wage Enslavement papers
16 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm
(The latter was co-authored by David Gamage.) [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In the didactic genre (or subgenre), “mirrors for princes,” philosophers instruct kings and princes how to rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:16 am
Another would be to educate social media users to detect fake news and efforts at disinformation—a kind of see something, say something strategy adopted from counterterrorism. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 5:54 am
Regarding the Philippines, Secretary Austin and Jose C. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
In fact, as the court noted, when “[c]onfronted with this language at oral argument, government counsel conceded that ‘a rule can be issued, prescribed, or promulgated without publication in the Federal Register or prior to publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm
So it is for lawyers to see how they can adopt new skills and where they might like to focus their skills in addition to legal knowledge. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
As an historical matter, many of the developments we discussed above after the arrival of new membership at the Court began to occur quite quickly. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
[c.] [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
Judge Edith Jones wrote a short concurrence, calling the platforms’ arguments “ludicrous” and the platforms the “Goliaths of internet communications,” as compared with the “Davids who use their platforms. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Thus, the bills unintentionally adopted accurate titles, and they self-admitted their unconstitutionality. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
In 2007, Christina Romer and David Romer, professors of economics at the University of California Berkeley, conducted a study to determine the impact of legislated tax changes on the economy. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
by Michael C. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am
The two communities have now taken the matter to the ECtHR, and in a communicated case, Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium – 16760/22, they argue that the decrees adopted in 2017 and 2018 are an unjustified and discriminatory interference with their freedom of religion under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
