Search for: "Matter of Brown v Stanford"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
Session 5: The Content Collection Controversy Moderator: Bobby Chesney (UT) Participants: Timothy Edgar (Brown University), Jennifer Granick (Stanford University) The metadata session was followed by a session that focused exclusively on content-collection. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
The other two witnesses were Professor Dan Burk (UC Irvine) and Andrew Pincus (Mayer Brown, representing BSA). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Our Working Group’s members may write to the Commission separately on whether, as a matter of policy, the proposal should be adopted or modified; those matters are beyond the scope of these comments. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
10 Myths and Facts About Workers' Compensation Posted by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Community Staff The LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation Law Community and the award-winning blog Work Comp Roundup have teamed up to present some common myths and facts about workers’ compensation. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Or they may consciously adopt the role of “public intellectuals,” where the key datum is the receptivity of reporters or the editors of op-ed pages to solicit their views about pressing matters of the day. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IPRoo), Giving Goliath the slingshot: Review of the National Innovation System on 'the costs of enforcing IP rights': (Australia & New Zealand Intellectual Property Law), Take patent policy away from lawyers, says Australian government report: (IAM), Advisory Council announces review of scope of patentable subject matter: (International Law Office), Federal Court's flu shot for patent law: Notice to Practitioners - Proceedings under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth):… [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
As I explain in my book at greater length, Chief Justice Salmon Chase dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision in Bradwell v Illinois (1873), which upheld the discrimination against women in licensing lawyers. [read post]
