Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly"
Results 81 - 100
of 638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kelly, Hyde Park, appellant pro se. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
” It does not matter, Roberts continued, that the Maine program was intended to provide students with the equivalent of a free public education, which is secular. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
It is the competitive process, not the fortunes of particular competitors, that matters. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
Real USFL, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Mike Kelly to obtain information about stock trades. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
As to the penalty imposed, termination, the court said that the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience, citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
As to the penalty imposed, termination, the court said that the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience, citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
In Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
In Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A simple example: an individual appointed as a provisional or temporary employee in a position in the competitive class does not have the same employee statutory rights as those enjoyed by an individual holding a permanent appointment in the same competitive class title.[12] An individual’s statutory right to many benefits of employment such as eligibility to compete in a promotion examination for a higher grade position, his or her seniority in a layoff situation, and the right to… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A simple example: an individual appointed as a provisional or temporary employee in a position in the competitive class does not have the same employee statutory rights as those enjoyed by an individual holding a permanent appointment in the same competitive class title.[12] An individual’s statutory right to many benefits of employment such as eligibility to compete in a promotion examination for a higher grade position, his or her seniority in a layoff situation, and the right to… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
