Search for: "Matter of Jonathan T." Results 81 - 100 of 2,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 5:58 pm
Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart is "angry" with federal judge Victoria Phillips's order that enjoins the military from enforcing Don't Ask, Don't Tell. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 7:34 pm
I am continuing to cogitate on the matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:52 pm by Jordan Flake
Just like we can’t use the trust account to pay our expenses, I can’t use Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:52 pm by Jordan Flake
Just like we can’t use the trust account to pay our expenses, I can’t use Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:52 pm by Jordan Flake
Just like we can’t use the trust account to pay our expenses, I can’t use Mr. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 11:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
I’m fairly sure someone said exactly this in the comments to Jonathan’s post, but I didn’t wade through the 400+ (the VC commentariat is back?!) [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The caption of this post is the headline of this column by WaPo columnist Jonathan Capehart. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:51 am
He said it didn't matter -- it was 'injustice on behalf of a good cause.' The 'good cause' was #MeToo. 'The way you change behavior,' he said, is through fear -- the same point that Jonathan Edwards made. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm by Joe Patrice
It Is Better 100 Innocent Persons Should Suffer: Justice Alito doesn't see why "not actually breaking the law" should matter. [read post]
25 May 2016, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 The class valedictorian Jonathan Montgomery invited all the graduates to stand and recite the prayer. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am by Lawrence Taylor
For that matter, given the evidence, aren’t we punishing them for a genetic condition? [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:47 pm by WIMS
Dep't of the Army, 55 F.3d 827, 847 (3d Cir. 1995), the Plaintiffs might have survived summary judgment had they obtained conclusive medical evidence that they faced a one-in-a-million increased risk of cancer. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:06 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Star-Telegram: Jonathan Hudson has learned that some things just don't go on Facebook--namely jury duty. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 10:28 am
"No matter how much money you have, you can't buy class," Mathesius said of Corzine, the state's wealthy leader.Of his judicial superiors, Mathesius maintained once again that he was punished not for any impropriety but for exercising his right to free speech. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"He said university officials knew it wasn't legitimate because he told them. [read post]
It doesn’t sit too easily with T 116/18 either, which if anything adopted the opposite ab initio implausibility approach in holding that the opponent must demonstrate that there is a legitimate reason to doubt that the technical effect applies to the claimed subject-matter. [read post]