Search for: "Matter of Palmer v Palmer" Results 81 - 100 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Brian Galbraith
Contact Galbraith Family Law today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards resolving your family law matter in Ontario. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:51 pm
”The prevailing insurer in the matter was represented by attorneys from Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The conduct of legal matters routinely "involve[ ] questions of judgment and discretion as to which even the most distinguished members of the profession may differ" (Byrnes v Palmer, 18 App Div 1, 4, affd 160 NY 699). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]