Search for: "Matter of Will of Padilla"
Results 81 - 100
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 8:46 am
That obligation was imposed by the United States Supreme Court in Padilla v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
Jones to schedule an appointment with a criminal defense attorney who handles these serious matters. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
Jones to schedule an appointment with a criminal defense attorney who handles these serious matters. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:48 am
The petitioner replies that this court should conclude that Padilla applies retroactively as a matter of Connecticut law and affirm the habeas court’s judgment...We conclude that Padilla does not apply retroactively to the petitioner’s plea and that the petitioner cannot prevail on either of the alternative grounds. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:45 am
The suspended sentence doesn't matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 12:51 pm
Your honor can rest assured that this matter is at an end. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Padilla v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:47 am
We need a better name for this case like we had for the Liberty City Seven matter. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:49 pm
I love the Padilla case . [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
You will remember Padilla v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Neo-Chicago recognizes that there are both false positives and false negatives and that the frequency and costs of these is an empirical matter than may vary over time and jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
In essence, this is not so much a Padilla case as it is a Strickland case. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:36 pm
In March, the Supreme Court in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:40 pm
*Further subject matter dealing with this topic can be found on the In the Media section of this Website referencing the case of State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:39 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Chief Justice Young wrote a concurrence in the vacation and denial, stating that although criminal defendants have a right to an impartial juryand to a fair trial, the Constitution does not require unconditionally that jurors not discuss the case among themselves before the matter is submitted to them for decision. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
"In some professions, disrespecting a superior's order can get you into a heap of hot water and, if you're a New York City Police Officer, it could also cost you some pay.In Matter of Padilla v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
Padilla, S257302. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
Padilla, LA Super. [read post]
