Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Nonetheless, in at least some cases, directors may refuse to resign and the company may find itself in violation of the listing requirements. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:21 am
The high court discouraged the use of "Pearl Harbor-like" plans by board factions to disenfranchise other directors and chided the chancery court for labeling large stockholders as "super directors" (OptimisCorp v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The source of compensation of a member of the board of directors. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Bruch v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
In OptimisCorp v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:04 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:17 am
Under the law, each public company was required to have a minimum of one woman on its board of directors by the close of 2019. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The district director, Benefits Review Board, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit disagreed. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:22 am
Board's Rejection of Plurality-Plus Director Resignation: Delaware Weighs In A few weeks ago, the WSJ ran an article about how some boards were rejecting resignations by directors after they failed to achieve a majority vote "for" at an annual shareholders meeting. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 3:47 pm
Hall v Stewart, 2019 ABCA 98 [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:02 am
The Court interpreted the fairly common "continuing director" provision in the indenture in a way that could have been expected, stating the board may approve as continuing directors persons nominated by dissident stockholders. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
For more detail, see the Litigation Release in SEC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
The plaintiffs argued that the directors faced substantial likelihood of liability under Marchand v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:15 am
Sibelius concerns the extent to which the guarantee of free exercise of religion under the Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act may be asserted by for-profit corporations, the Court’s decision may also have important—and unsettling—implications for state corporate laws that define the fiduciary duties of boards of directors. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 6:27 pm
(enunciated in Edmond v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:17 am
The lawsuit, Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:49 am
Circuit which deals with the legality of President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, Noel Canning v. [read post]
