Search for: "May v. Lease Service, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Proof that the plaintiff has submitted "enough facts to enable [the] court to determine that a viable" cause of action exists (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d at 71; see Gray v Doyle, 170 AD3d at 971) may be established by an affidavit of a party or someone with knowledge, authenticated documentary proof, or by complaint verified by the plaintiff that sufficiently details the facts and the basis for the defendant's liability (see CPLR… [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
Mylife.com, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:26 am
Kahn III, last week handed down its decision in Kinyk v Hart, this time denying the motion on the merits. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 8:29 am
” Id. at 484–85 & n.2; see also Trinity Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
Following project approval, the Regents filed a notice of determination (NOD) on May 17, 2019, identifying American Campus Communities, American Campus Communities Services, Inc., American Campus Communities Partnership, L.P. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bank, N.A. v Westwood, LLC, 115 AD3d 935, 937-938; Viafax Corp. v Citicorp Leasing, Inc., 54 AD3d at 850). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
For example, in the case of Steves and Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
Stevenson cited Masterpiece Inc v Alavida Lifestyles Inc, (2011 SCC 27) at paragraph 49, wherein Justice Rothstein clarified the effect of section 6(5)(e): “… the degree of resemblance, although the last factor listed in s. 6(5), is the statutory factor that is often likely to have the greatest effect on the confusion analysis. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Instead, it held that the proper question was whether there was “substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment or may exacerbate existing environmental hazards. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Instead, it held that the proper question was whether there was “substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment or may exacerbate existing environmental hazards. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
” (Citing Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 5:03 am
Maverick Construction Management Services, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court, in Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 8:25 am
” See Cruise.com, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Gil v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Gil v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:23 am
Aug. 12, 2021) Query whether this kind of case will come out differently as TransUnion v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
