Search for: "McGuire v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 7:00 am
Poole v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm
The Defendant in Allcorn v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
and Hull McGuire love humans and therefore love all jurors (except for The-Morally-Certain and, of course, some Duke grads and most engineers). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
Terminating a teacher during his or her probationary periodZarinfar v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:40 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
McGuire, 502 U. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
Justice McGuire dissented, following the Court of Appeals' holdings. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:16 am
¶15 (quoting NACCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
Arkansas, to Yeager v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
