Search for: "McMahon v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
"Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) provides that an agency may deny access to records that are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute" (see Matter of Crowe v Guccione, supra); and3. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
"Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) provides that an agency may deny access to records that are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute" (see Matter of Crowe v Guccione, supra); and3. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 10:56 am
Specifically, Judge McMahon noted that the plaintiffs did not allege any “actual adverse effects” resulting from the removal of copyright information, as required by the US Supreme Court’s TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
Wilburn v McMahon, 296 AD2d 805, is an example of such a disciplinary action.In Wilburn, a New York State Trooper, Douglas A. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:49 am
The case is, Great American Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 1:02 pm
Yesterday's Louisiana Court of Appeal decision in State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:29 pm
McMahon Contracting, L.P. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:54 am
(3) McMahon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:44 pm
McMahon, at pp.46-49, in Courcelle v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:44 pm
In McMahon v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:07 pm
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
General reasonable suspicion of driving without a license just because of knowledge of the defendant
29 Dec 2007, 9:16 am
State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm
McMahon to Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:22 pm
See also McMahon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Casella, 901 F.Supp. 90, 93 (N.D.N.Y.1995) (McAvoy, C.J.); McMahon v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:14 pm
Following McMahon v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:09 pm
JW Gaming Development (Sovereign Immunity)McMahon v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 6:51 am
The case is Rutherford v. [read post]
