Search for: "Means v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 81 - 100 of 489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy & Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am by MBettman
James receives his social security benefits by direct deposit in a Florida bank, and does not file any federal, state, or local income tax returns that list the Ohio house as his residence. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
The Court was bound by Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Ruas [2010] EWCA Civ 291, holding that the Claimant was an ‘employed person’ with the meaning of Article 1(a) of the Regulation, rather than an “employed person”, with Title III Ch 1, which deals with the portability of sickness and maternity benefits, engaged to restrict the right to export DLA. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Australia has passed a new law to punish social media companies for not policing violent content. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:10 pm
  May your remaining years be filled with comfort, joy and security. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Title V also excludes persons who received shares pursuant to employee compensatory plans in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act from counting against the number of holders of record. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Catherine Coulter
With regard to the Privacy Commissioner’s findings, the use of video surveillance and GPS is generally not permitted for productivity management although it may be permitted if the employer can show a bona fide safety or security reason for the surveillance. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner Office has launched a major consultation on three draft documents related to its regulatory approach: an overarching Regulatory Action Policy, Statutory Guidance on Data Protection Act 2018 Action  and Statutory Guidance related to its Privacy and Electronic Communication Regulations (PECR) Powers. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
type=live&comm=uscc&filename=uscc012518 (link is external)Thursday, January 25, 2018Location: Dirksen 419Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:45 AM – 9:50 AM:           Opening Remarks: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:50 AM – 11:20 PM:          Panel I: Mercantilism with Chinese… [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
The critical issue to be determined in considering such claims, however, is whether or not the disabled employee was at work within the meaning of the statute providing for such benefits when he or she suffered the injury.In the Cossifos case, the question to be resolved was whether an employee who was injured while eating lunch at the worksite was engaged in performing his or her duties for the purpose of eligibility for disability retirement benefits under the Retirement and… [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 175l et seq.) at the school. (2) The term “public health emergency designation” means the declaration— (A) of a public health emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another coronavirus with pandemic potential, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d); or (B) of a domestic emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or… [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" The appropriate standard of review, said the Appellate Division, is whether SCI's determination "was affected by an error of law," citing Mulgrew v Board of Education of the City School District of New York, 87 AD3d 506. [read post]