Search for: "Medtronic Minimed" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2007, 8:05 am
Medtronic (expected in Spring to early Summer 2008) will implicitly turn Notmeyer around.In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 501 F. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
  As long as such claims assert medical malpractice – and not some bogus supplier strict liability theory – in most states they will meet the rather minimal fraudulent joinder standards for pleading a “colorable” cause of action, and thereby prevent successful removal.Not in Louisiana – at least recently − so defense counsel need to be attuned to this possibility.Medical malpractice actions in Louisiana are governed by statute, La. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010) (our longer post on Bryant is here). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 Bypassing Mensing entirely and muddling both preemption law and DePuy’s argument, the Court held that, because the Pinnacle was a Class II medical device, not a generic prescription drug, any express preemption argument was foreclosed by Medtronic v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
 The FDA also cited an earlier one-year dog study which found that found a “minimal foreign body reaction” to the mesh. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am by Steve McConnell
.- The court goes with the dissent, not the majority opinion, in In re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelity Leads Products Liability Litigation, 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)    Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 567 F.3d1314, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
The trial court levied nearly $344 million in civil penalties against Ethicon for willfully circulating misleading medical device instructions and marketing communications that misstated, minimized, and/or omitted the health risks of Ethicon’s surgically-implantable transvaginal pelvic mesh products. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am by Bona Law PC
Author: Luis Blanquez California’s long-standing public policy in favor of employee mobility over an employer’s ability to prohibit any worker from going to work for a competitor is included in California Business & Professions Code Section 16600. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Medtronic Sofamore Danek, Inc., 424 F.3d 1293, 1310 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010) (we previously discussed Bryant here). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
A step behind: (Spicy IP),Proposals for ISPs to terminate infringers go (even more) global: (LawFont.com),Five ways to minimize risk of copyright liability from citizen media: (IP ADR Blog), Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralMillennium Pharmaceuticals spent $1.28 million on lobbying for patent reform and biologics legislation in 2007: (Patent Docs),New Thai Minister may review compulsory licences on cancer drugs: (Intellectual Property… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,595,000 owned by ProChemTech International, Inc. and entitled OPERATION OF EVAPORATIVE COOLING TOWER WITH MINIMAL OR NO BLOWDOWN. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
As regular watchers of our Drug Preemption Scorecard know, the good guys had been on a bit of a roll with preemption in prescription drug cases in 2008. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:06 pm
Because telemedicine laws vary by state, and the health care professional offering medical services to patients out-of-state is subject to the laws of both the home and the remote state, it is critical to get the right legal guidance.Some states explicitly regulate telemedicine by statute, others by regulation, while others do not refer to telemedicine but phrase their legal rules in terms of the practice by health care professionals who are out of state. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]