Search for: "Miner v. Superior Court" Results 81 - 100 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
On May 10, 2018, the Court granted leave in Minister of Citizenship and Immigration v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
What should be a per curiam affirmance of the Superior Court, however, could result in another act of asbestos exceptionalism by Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:46 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Specifically, the lawsuit filed in the Suffolk Superior Court in Boston alleges that his contractors knowingly had workers remove material containing deadly asbestos fibers without wearing proper protective clothing and without having ventilators or respirators. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Clearly some courts have been impressed by the special hazards of “asbestos,” from even fleeting or nominal exposures, without distinguishing mineral fiber types. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 1:39 pm by Dylan Gibbs
BMC Minerals asked the Court of Appeal to “clarify” its original decision by putting a deadline on the consultation. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Dec. 19, 2008)Absence of 50(b) motion in the trial court deprives Appeals Court of ability to consider AT&T's appeal from J* for EEOC on its religion (Jehovah's Witnesses)/failure-to-accommodate, discharge discrim suitDC Circuit* Adams v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 7:13 am by John Jascob
On virtually every dimension, Ludwin said, centralized services are superior to decentralized ones. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The company said it would appeal the verdict, which occurred in California Superior Court in Oakland. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
Schepers memorialized his contemporaneous observations, which frequently contradicted him when he was confronted by well-prepared defense counsel, in court or deposition examination. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here6th CircuitMadden v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Schachtman
Superior Court, 13 Cal.4th 1104, 56 Cal. [read post]