Search for: "Mintz v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Co. v Liebman, Adolf & Charme, 257 AD2d 424; VDR Realty Corp. v Mintz, 167 AD2d 986; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124 AD2d at 582; see also DePinto v Rosenthal & Curry, 237 AD2d 482, 482)". [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:49 am
Sutherland in Upstart Business Journal/Portfolio.com: Kickstarter Turns Crowdfunding Up To 11 Patton Boggs in Revolution Analytics’ Revolutions: EU court’s SAS ruling conflicts with Oracle v Google McDermott Will & Emery in WSJ’s Corruption Currents: High Tide: From Wal-Mart Testing Corporate Citizenship To Being Unfit For Command Reed Smith on Lenders 360: Why Do Lenders Disdain Bankruptcy Court? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recognized in the recent case of Mintz v Dietz & Watson that if either (a) the problem or (b) the solution is non-obvious, then the invention meets the non-obvious requirement for patentability. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
Marcus and Neil Mintz v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
The outcome of Mintz v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:19 am
If your privacy policy states that you comply with the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:09 pm
To my knowledge, Hawaii is the only other state which has adopted the "same proof" test of preemption.Grace Hunt IT Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides free access to the Brief for Appellant in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:07 am
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 131 S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
The case of Mintz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts of the week: Trade Secret and Covenant Not to Compete Posts, Cases and Articles: In the latest high profile battle over which state's law should apply (i.e., California v. every other state), sports agent Aaron Mintz is battling his former employer Priority Sports & Entertainment over the enforceability of his non-compete. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
State (Ala. 2001) and Rejent v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:01 am
Martin, Harrington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
In an op-ed in the Washington Post, George Will urges the Court to grant cert. in Harmon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
As alleged in the complaint (PhoneDog LLC v. [read post]
