Search for: "Mitchell v. Johnson*" Results 81 - 100 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 9:02 am by John Hochfelder
Plaintiff’s counsel, Mitchel Ashley, asked the judge to bring the jury back and question them because it appeared that the jurors intended the $120,000 to be multiplied, and by 16.6 (not 11.6) years, in order to come up with the actual amount for total future pain and suffering. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 31 October 2014, Warby J handed down judgment following the PTR in Mitchell v News Group ([2014] EWHC 3590 (QB)) There was also an assessment of damages in the case of Johnson v Steele. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Pringle called Mitchell Dean, brother of deceased Heather Dean. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J gave directions in the two “Plebgate” libel actions, Mitchell v NGN and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Richard Hillgrove v The Sunday Times. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Mitchell, 11-9843 (the habeas case “essentially the same” as Johnson v. [read post]