Search for: "Mitchell v. State of Texas (two Cases)"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
Aid to parochial schools: In Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
Case Study: Beckman v Match.com The case in question–and the reason I wanted to write about this–involves Mary Kay Beckman, a 46-year-old Match.com user who was paired with suitor Wade Mitchell Ridley, 50, through the site. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
There was hardly an expenditure for the benefit of religious entities that struck them as concerning, as seen in their plurality in Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, there was police action: the two boys have been hit with felony charges. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The method for this exploration is two brief case studies. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in two cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
Two years ago, the Court heard arguments in Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
The only contrary authority that I found in the published case law is one Texas decision, that creates a split among sister courts on the issue. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
Had the Marshalls read these two documents together, they would have discovered that BP was not conducting good-faith continuous operations. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am
Kleinberger (pictured), Emeritus Professor of Law at William Mitchell College of Law in St. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
” Peter Lee, “Patent Law and the Two Cultures,” 120 Yale L.J. 2, 4 (2010); see also Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
The citation to Wells was clearly wrong in that the plaintiffs in that case had, in fact, relied upon studies that were nominally statistically significant, and so the Wells court could not have held that statistical significance was unnecessary.[1] The two other cases cited by the Supreme Court, however, were both about “differential diagnosis,” and had nothing to do with statistical significance. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
Next, representing state governments, will be the solicitor general of Texas, Jonathan F. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
New Hampshire State Prison, 2014 U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am
The combined cases the Court heard for about ninety minutes (EPA v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
The cases are EPA v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]