Search for: "My Name Ltd. v. Doe" Results 81 - 100 of 715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
My article is uploaded here: And a version appears below: Justice Must Be Seen To Be Done … But What Does That Mean? [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Title was in their three names, but the cottage was partnership property. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse;  Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand: Dominion Rent… [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:14 am
This question has been indirectly considered in two recent English cases: Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc.The background to both cases is different.Skyscape supplies cloud computer services to organisations within the UK public sector. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
     The removal of the own name defence and fundamental rights – Sky v SkyKickSky v SkyKick [2017] EWHC 1769 (Ch) (July 2017)Most trade mark lawyers know Sky’s reputation for pursuing action against anyone using the word SKY in their name, even SKYPE. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 9:19 am by J
FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Co Ltd [2022] UKSC 1 is a big deal in the world of residential leasehold property disputes. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
  The innocence of youth: cub KnutBy way of background: Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG had – initially only partly successfully, and on appeal to the Board of Appeal, fully successfully - opposed a Community trade mark application for ‘KNUT — DER EISBÄR’ in the name of KNUT IP Management Ltd and for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 25, 28 and 41. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
  |  Rights on photographs of fake social profiles  |  IPEC hears big claims  |  Spanish copyright reform  |  Court of Appeal for England and Wales’ decision in Interflora v M&S | IPEC on confusing business names in Anglian Windows Ltd v Anglian Roofline Ltd  |  Ford Denied Well-Known Trademark Protection in Russia  |  Crayola suit to prevent genericide and… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am by Jeremy Speres
  I have my doubts about this as a general proposition for company name objections – yes, company names are very often different to the parties’ actual trading names, but they are likewise very often the same. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Gmlevine
They came up because the Respondent cited a recent case from the Ninth Circuit, GOPETS Ltd. v. [read post]