Search for: "N. Strickland"
Results 81 - 100
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
” (14 n.7) And, reviewing the whole course of conduct of Maples’ pro bono attorneys, the Court seemingly had little difficulty concluding that they crossed the line from negligence into abandonment. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:06 am
” (14 n.7) And, reviewing the whole course of conduct of Maples’ pro bono attorneys, the Court seemingly had little difficulty concluding that they crossed the line from negligence into abandonment. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Strickland in Ohio has granted a commutation to Sidney Cornwell, which means, save for the Baze v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
Matthews, 66 M.J. at 652, n.13, citing to United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am
(The prejudice test from Strickland is a good example, expressly removing from consideration the possibility of an idiosyncratic jury.) [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:00 pm
Verkuil Chair in Public Law at the Benjamin N. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
She wrote that “[i]n an appropriate future case, this Court should decide this issue. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Discussion The Sixth Amendment provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
The ads consist of such warm holiday greetings as, “[i]n any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Verkuil Chair in Public Law at the Benjamin N. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
Strickland, No. 07-3600 A provision of Ohio Rev. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 (1972): “[i]n some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the [erroneously admitted evidence] is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the [evidence] was harmless error. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:05 am
Strickland, 902 F.3d 937 (11th Cir. 1990)). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:55 am
Neither element of the Strickland test is met. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm
Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 (1972): “[i]n some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the [erroneously admitted evidence] is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the [evidence] was harmless error. [read post]
