Search for: "N.B. v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[See, for example, DeMarco v City of Albany, 75 AD2d 674, Amkraut v Hults, 21 AD2d 260].* See Civil Service Law §75 [3].** N.B. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
The attorney was served with a copy of the decision of July 24, 2006 but Awaraka did not file her Article 75 petition until September 11, 2006, which was more than ten days after her attorney was served with the disciplinary determination.As such, said the Appellate Division, "this proceeding is time-barred," and sustained the lower court's ruling.Weeks v State of New York, 198 AD2d 615, discusses the procedural requirements that must be met in order to challenge an… [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States began its October 2012 term last week. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:01 am
The attorney was served with a copy of the decision of July 24, 2006 but Awaraka did not file her Article 75 petition until September 11, 2006, which was more than ten days after her attorney was served with the disciplinary determination.As such, said the Appellate Division, “this proceeding is time-barred,” and sustained the lower court’s ruling.Weeks v State of New York, 198 AD2d 615, discusses the procedural requirements that must be met in order to challenge… [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:55 am
  Hormel began its argument by stating it coined the term SPAM 70 years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
* Tenure by estoppel or acquiesce results "when a school board accepts the continued services of a teacher or administrator, but fails to take the action required by law to either grant or deny tenure prior to the expiration of the teacher's probationary term" [McManus v Bd. of Educ. of Hempstead UFSD, 87 NY2d 183]. ** See Education Law §2509[1][a]; §3014[1] N.B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]