Search for: "Nautilus" Results 81 - 100 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 7:39 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
ALLEN’S TSDR 5500913 ENDURANCE TSDR 5504609 COZYWEIGHT TSDR 5504608 COZYWEIGHT TSDR 5504585 NP NEW PAIGE LLC FEEDING YOUR SEED FOR THE PERFECT PAIGE IN LIFE TSDR 5500701 THE ACADEMY OF VETERINARY TECHNICIANS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE AVTCP TSDR 5500671 TOTAL SELF STORAGE WORLD DOMINATION TSDR 5500624 PIZZERIA CAMION TSDR 5500545 CONSTRUCTIONLIGHTS.COM TSDR 5504416 SOLVANTAGE TSDR 5504253 WHITETAILER TSDR 5505071 HIRECREDIT TSDR 5505047 ZORN TSDR 5503983 OPENSKY TSDR 5500264 TSDR 5500261… [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Consider that — the lawsuit was filed before eBay limited injunctive relief, before KSR made it easier to invalidate a patent as obvious, before Nautilus raised the standard for indefiniteness, before Alice and Mayo opened the door to eligibility invalidation, and before Congress created the regime of AIA trials. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 7:48 am by Dennis Crouch
  The case has interesting features in that (1) the Federal Circuit has previously approved of this claim language (but not on BRI); and (2) there is an ongoing dispute as to the application of Packard and Nautilus in AIA Trials. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:14 am by Sean Gallagher
(credit: Ole Jensen - Corbis/Getty Images) Peter "Rocket" Madsen, the Danish inventor who sought to put himself into space aboard an amateur-built rocket and built (with the aid of colleagues) his own submarine—the UC3 Nautilus—was found guilty today by a judge and two jurors in the bizarre death of journalist Kim Wall, who disappeared last August while aboard the Nautilus. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 9:45 pm by Scott McKeown
This is because the applied standard was stricter than that enunciated in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Fox (garymfox@umich.edu), University of Michigan Law School In Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Scott McKeown
(Packard was decided while Nautilus was pending before the SCOTUS). [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 8:13 pm by Patent Docs
Gene Quinn of IPWatchdog.com and Dave Stitzel of Reed Tech® will discuss best practices for filing a robust application to avoid 112 rejections and associated problems, and will address the following topics: • Indefiniteness: Nautilus (SCOTUS standard) versus In re Packard (USPTO standard) • Identifying and Interpreting 112(f) means plus function limitations • Alternative and Negative Limitations • Relational and Exemplary Language • Numerical Ranges and Amount… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:21 am by Dennis Crouch
This decision could provide helpful guidance to patent prosecutors, but the situation is tangled because some experts worry that the Federal Circuit is disregarding the Supreme Court’s finding in Nautilus (2014) that a patent is indefinite if it doesn’t describe the invention with “reasonable certainty. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
  In Nautilus (2014), the Supreme Court held that the claims as drafted must define the scope of the invention (from the perspective of PHOSITA) with “reasonable certainty. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2015).The CAFC found no reasoning in the district court opinionUnder Nautilus, the question presented here is this:would the “composition . . . effective to catalyze” language,understood in light of the rest of the patent and theknowledge of the ordinary skilled artisan, have given aperson of ordinary skill in the art a reasonably certainunderstanding of what compositions are covered? [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 9:07 pm by Patent Docs
Gene Quinn, founder of IPWatchdog.com; Todd Van Thomme of Nyemaster Goode; Cynthia Gilbert of Blueshift IP, LLC; and Dave Stitzel, IP Solutions Consultant at LexisNexis® IP will discuss the following: • Nautilus versus In re Packard. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sean Gallagher
About the only fact that Madsen had previously admitted to was that Kim Wall, who was writing a feature story about Madsen's mission to put himself into space, had died on the evening of August 10 aboard UC3 Nautilus—the submersible craft he designed, built, and maintained with crowdsourced funding and the assistance of members of Copenhagen Suborbitals (another group of space enthusiasts). [read post]