Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
Attorney prepares (allegedly) "incomplete and incompetent" briefs that the Court of Appeal rejects. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:00 pm
Posted by Jeff NowakEmployers and fellow FMLA nerds, consider this an early holiday present: Courts are increasingly dismissing FMLA claims when they find that the employer has an honest belief that the employee has engaged in FMLA fraud. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:47 am
Lots of names familiar to appellate nerds are in the article (e.g., Panelli, Krinsky). [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 5:55 pm
If you were a huge nerd in law school and are just itching for more personal jurisdiction hypotheticals, take a look at today's opinion from the Court of Appeal, where the issue is whether Audi AG -- which is the German parent -- can be sued in California for selling a defective Audi in California through its U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:58 am
Overhead and profit issues may be an interesting academic issue for insurance nerds, but Kelly Kubiak and her friends took the cause all the way to the Florida Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
Zuckerberg rose from computer science nerd at Harvard to the CEO of a multibillion dollar internet corporation, but his climb to fame and fortune was not without controversy. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
The subtitle is "A Hamiltonian on the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:09 pm
Still, it was good to see some of my nerd friends at the virtual reception and I look forward to the sessions over the next couple of days. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm
If that's not scintillating, I don't know what is.If you can contain your excitement, know that courts take differing points of view on this and so the question is somewhat significant to nerds. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 pm
There are no defense lawyers on the court. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:41 pm
The law nerds among you may be wondering, what is the point of that citation? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm
So even if you're not purely an Article III nerd, there is substantial evidence sufficient for appellate practitioners to attend. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am
You Supreme Court nerds out there (and you know who you are) are probably aware of the fact that the United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in McWilliams v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am
You Supreme Court nerds out there (and you know who you are) are probably aware of the fact that the United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in McWilliams v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:10 pm
Which fact may strike you as at least a one on the nerd-o-meter. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:25 pm
For all the trivia nerds out there, I forgot to mention two important, but oft-unmentioned facts about yesterday’s argument. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:36 am
Venkat at Spam Notes has a pretty good breakdown of the court's ruling (which links to an expanded summary at the Technology & Marketing Law Blog), including the important distinction between information which is "publicly available," and that which isn't. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:30 am
Imagine going to court to enforce an unsigned arbitration agreement with an employee. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:01 pm
Supreme Court bar and am about to be admitted to Illinois. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
And yes, often no courts with arms long enough to reach into the depth of the cryptocurrency world. [read post]
