Search for: "Nix v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:49 am
State law claim. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
“However, since Abood, the Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged that compelling a state employee to financially support a public sector union seriously impinges upon free speech and association interests protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution,” he argued, among other contentions. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:46 pm
See State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:41 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
” Some also do not believe the new units “will be capable of capturing key towns” from ISIS without “forward-deployed US combat teams,” which President Obama has nixed. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 7:20 pm
In the words of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:01 am
Here are the facts of State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
First, the provision would nix FISA’s current ban on challenging a nondisclosure order for a one-year period after the issuance of the relevant production order. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:23 am
The United States Supreme Court held today that President Obama’s 2012 appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were not valid recess appointments under the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
Wurie, No. 13–212, the United States Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit went the opposite way and suppressed evidence from a warrantless cell phone search incident to arrest.There is no controlling precedent in this circuit. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
We’re still waiting to hear the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in two similar cases at the federal level: Riley v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
“If the Campbells had named their son ‘R2D2,’ state authorities would have intervened,” Carlton Larson, a law professor at the University of California, Davis wrote in a 2011 study of United States baby names. [read post]
